THESE COPS ARE WRONG AND THEY ALL SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR WHAT THEY DID TO PATRICA, PUTTING HER AWAY FOR LIFE FOR SOMETHING SHE DID NOT DO. However, while sticking solely to the Rorrer case, the issue of the husbands alibi is very much open to doubt if one takes into consideration what the documentary, STARZ-The Wrong Man (in two parts) has revealed. Clearly, there are a lot of irrational people out there. Oh, and she was so obsessed with him that she started dating and found herself a boyfriend that was not only younger, but much more attractive than Andy? Anyway, there are thousands of people who differ from that belief, that is why there is so much controversy surrounding this case, and that is why there have been numerous convicted people in the past whove been exonerated on appeal. While not a guilt sceptic, I suggest this was either ill-conceived expression or an expression of misguided mindset for its not for the defendant (albeit now convict) to convince of innocence but for prosecution to convince of guilt (and per appeal, that guilt is safe rather than innocence unproven). Why would somebody tell you, theyre going to fry me, if they didnt do it? Jarrett told Wrong Man. They were there in the winter months in which the bodies would have been frozen most of the time. Just consider all your nasty posts about others opinions and learn to attack the argument, not the arguer with insults. On January 11, 2021, Dont know from where youve got your information about this case my guess is youve been watching a lot of those documentaries which revel in showing the case in a disgracefully biased manner. But hang on You ask that I show care with my wording and show all the tolerance in the world, and by that you presumably mean I should simply ignore those who villify her in the most disgraceful way, probably in the opinion that all readers of their comments will agree, and no one is going to take offence! Prime Video: Wrong Man - Season 2 Patricia has been wrongfully convicted of murdering Joann and Alex Katrinak in 1994. You people are fighting a losing cause! Miami Herald Article on Bobby Kent's Murder - Forensic Files Now She said that shes no fan of Forensic Files and that the show had many misrepresentations about her case and that shed heard ForensicFilesNow.com mixed up some facts as well. This case is not over yet more to follow only trouble is, law moves along at a pitiful pace. And the obvious answer is not as you claim. I dont even know its Christmas.. The investigation is a bit out of place, but the DNA test can be altered only if its made just from a pen, because otherwise it is not possible, only if they said they did it and didnt actually do it, which would be quite difficult because it would mean complicity between many persons. After Joann Katrinak, the wife of Patricias former flame, turned up dead along with her infant son, prosecutors suspected Patricia. Patricia Rorrer was convicted of both deaths in the mid-90's and is serving a life sentence. She will be in jail for the rest of her life and rightly so. Probably by the jeans and the boots. They are a joke. I didnt know about the supposed SIDS death of Rorrers first-born. Patricias professional life included short-lived gigs as a Century 21 real estate agent and an Oldsmobile salesperson. Why bother with this site, which isnt for professional criminalists/forensic scientists, if youre going to get so tetchy and rude? Meticulous primping. Calling her ex because she just likes to stay in touch w peopleLOL! Sorry, I must have missed your name on the witness list. Thats my life.. I mean the husband did do some shady things maybe he was involved? Finally, another irony you fail to appreciate: you claim theres money to be made from the commercials added into their show. Whoever writes this amateurish swill should get a real life, andsa real job. False. She failed miserably to convince me, or anyone else who mattered, of her innocence.. What time will shops open on Sunday 27th Dec 2020 I saw lots of her defenders saying that he got the hairs from a hairbrush of hers that he had somehow saved, which I thought was absolutely ridiculous. As I stated previously, if she cannot speak for herself, Im happy to step up on her behalf. To be sure, an appellant does not have to *prove* (convince) of innocence to have been wrongfully convicted (even if they are in fact guilty but I digress). There is pendency of DNA investigation for Routier. Curiously after this latest test, the 39 hairs removed only 34 were accounted for what became of the absent 4 hairs? Police slowly built a case against Patricia. Does it actually have to be an obligatory duty for anyone to be present at a trial before they are able to have an opinion? DA readily agreed they did not belong to Rorrer, was happy to admit they were never submitted for analysis. Im sorry Sally, I know you want someone to blame for the death of your daughter and grandson, but the person who actually killed her is serving a life sentence in another facility in Pennsylvania. Trash-talking ex. Im inclined to think both Rorrer and Routier are guilty. Those bodies would have been manipulated by something around there. Bully for you if youve read a lot and seen a lot: its meaningless to other posters and adds nothing to your argument for innocence. But Patricia had moved from Pennsylvania years ago, and she'd started her own family in North Carolina. He wanted to move to Colorado and she was against it.. Rorrers defenders remind me of a case in my home town There was a killer who confessed, was caught on video committing the murder and was seen committing the crime by an eye witness. As for Joanns parents, her father died a year after the murder. And in a piece of salacious testimony, Patricia Rorrers half sister, Sandra Ireland, said that in May 1995, about six months after the murder, their mother, Patricia Chambers, stopped by the house and asked her to hold onto or hide a gun, or both. Not gender neutral. Suzanne Pearson fabricated quotes from Patricia including her claim that Patricia said, Im going to the electric chair upon her arrest because a conviction would boost Pearsons career. I dont think so. Pfeiffer and Burke claimed that police Sgt. Quote if I had known I would get caught, I would never have brought you into this world. Pat to Nicole her daughter. On Alexs diaper bag, police found strands of the same type of hair from the car. Shes just extremely happy with Andy, her brother, Michael OConnor, told the media. I comment on these forums because they are the only places offering the opportunity to, hopefully, bring awareness to those whore unfamiliar with this case and her unfair plight. Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. And its argued that it has been and dismissed as insignificant or irrelevant. And for you to even ask why documentaries are biased, makes me wonder if you have the ability to determine fact from fiction! She wanted all men to give her attention but she couldnt have everyones attention, especially ANDREWS!!! I think shes guilty for sure. Four months after Joanns disappearance, farmer Paul Kovalchik reported seeing what at first looked like a pile of clothes on his land in Heidelberg Township woods, about 15 miles from the Katrinaks house. Although the prosecution used it as evidence that she was trying to create a false alibi, it actually sounded more like Patricia was simply trying to nail down the facts he had already asserted to her. (McIntyre said that Egan ignored Traupman because he was a nut who said that the man he saw arguing with the woman in a car was Hispanic but wearing a fake mustache and a toupee. He took two tests and there was deception detected in BOTH. Watch Wrong Man season 2, and then come back and make comment. While most of the documentaries come out as reinforcing her guilt, albeit most of them giving differing accounts of the speculation which was presented at her trial, some going even further by showing scenes that were offered as theories at her trial, as FACT. In fact it clearly shows how short you are on all the details surrounding this case. Thank you Kerry. From what Ive seen its pretty obvious Patricia did do that to this poor woman and the baby. Sad discovery. Im sorry for the distress this awful business must have caused. Youll have to make do with what you see here. This is untrue. There is no justice for your loved ones when the wrong person is paying for the crime. This response of yours neatly sums up your dogmatic view of her guilt despite so much evidence to the contrary. Im sure shes innocent adds nothing other than to tell us your state of mind! Please read her story. The real killer is Rorrer! Charles Robert, the 3-month-old son she had with Gary Gabard, died of sudden infant death syndrome; Patricia found him blue in his crib. Catherine are you sure your names not Karen? Have you read the book? If you subscribe to Hulu and upgrade to Starz (theres a free one-week trial offer), you can stream the Wrong Man episodes about Patricia Rorrer. Most of your comment absolutely astonishes me. In a million years, she wouldnt do anything to harm that.. Prosecutors offered Patricia a plea deal that would take the death penalty off the table, but she declined. After an hour Id call anyone whod listen to me including police! Patricia and her husband broke up after the babys death. Well, at least you managed some sense there when you say that, especially when you take into account the amount of evidence and witnesses which were withheld from the Defence and what appears to be a clear case of evidence-tampering. Especially mice! They really need to set her free and open the case and look at the husband. Cop defends accused. We lived close to one another. What the prosecution failed to disclose to Rorrers defence team was that the cops, in their zeal to prove their gun theory, visited several addresses of which Rorrer was resident, dug up the gardens in which she was known to do target practice recovered several shell casings and bullets (more than 70), had them ballistically tested, but NOT ONE was found to be a match to the bullet recovered from the victim. DNA testing revealed the blood came from either Joann or her son. It has very bad energy. Convenient Suspect: A Wrongful Conviction In The Murder In Lehigh A lot of these documentaries feature most of the theories suggested by the cops and prosecution which were most damaging to her case, but not a single person to substantiate Rorrers side, or to challenge their versions. so then using your contention, one who is deeply religious and sees God as being a factual figure is wrong? If they were unable to get a DNA reading the first time, why the need for a second examination? The Innocence Project has declined to take her case. Yet they insisted in the trial that the call came in on the 13th. However, that first theory very neatly allows the cops to further theorise that the gun she once owned (which had a history of jamming after the first shot) was the one used at the murder. Ive found that in nearly every case, those who are firmly of the opinion shes guilty have an extremely limited knowledge of the case theyve watched one (or perhaps more) of the documentaries which make absolutely no attempt to show anything thats in Rorrers favour (theres plenty, if one bothers to look), and worse, revel in exaggerated and speculative scenes, some of which were never even mentioned at her trial. Walmart woe. Even if there were some minor flaws or discrepancies in the investigation, thats normal. Police believe Rorrer abducted and killed her ex-boyfriend's wife and infant son in Pennsylvania. She was always looking for a fight, Gary Gabard told the Morning Call, which noted that he was a head shorter than Patricia. And the fact that Patricia called Andrew even after he married someone else didnt mean she was still carrying a torch for him, according to one of her friends. I would suggest you take the time to read the book or, at least watch the documentaries which STICK TO THE FACTS, and then comment. Phone records confirmed Patricia placed the earlier call from North Carolina, not Pennsylvania. Why risk an appalling crime just to leave a marriage (though I know that people have and do kill the spouse in these situations, but killing ones children is extremely rare, particularly when not in murder-suicide context). Dial-a-problem. It might have said no root but could have been wrong. Very similar. The evidence was all there. You are correct the bodies were not there all that time, and it seems odd that they baby taken at 3 month, but when found he was 6 months according to Wrong Man. With Joann Katrinak, Alex Katrinak, Patricia Rorrer. None. Patricias accusers theorized that she resented Joanns domestic bliss with the tall, athletic Andrew Katrinak. simply to create an atmosphere of hatred towards a person who, in all probability, has been wrongfully imprisoned. Both were deceased. If in the woods in a rural area, no animal, rodent or insect touched those bodies? Wouldnt that verify Troutmans claim that the husband was arguing with the victim, in a rage? If her husband was going to do that Im sure he wouldve done it in a totally different way! Nope. Under supervision of a doctor, 39 hair specimens were removed, recorded and logged. Perhaps she used more than one gun using another/others for the target shooting than the one she killed with (and others shot with her?) ), And in another bombshell, Joanns good friend Karen Devine said Joann planned to leave Andrew after the holidays. Interesting thought about the alibi timing. Then 31 years old, she had lived a rocky existence. Joanne and Alex didnt disappear until 12/15. Ive scanned through of all my remarks on this site and nowhere have a seen a single remark that confirms your assertion that Ive been insulting. Too bad she got off with just a life sentence. My husband passed away of a broken heart, Sarah OConnor said on the Montel Williams Show in 2001. Maybe then you will see the wrongful conviction! They were telling the truth and revealing the type of person she was, a person that definitely would kill out of jealousy and revenge. Shes where she belongs in prison for the rest of her life. Women murder for all kinds of reasons, but the simple facts come down to this.there was physical evidence, the bullet wound matched that of the gun Pat owned, the hairs were Pats and at both scenes, and she had no alibi and she had lied to try and come up with one.and lets not forget the damning words she spoke to her 18 month old daughter that the officer had the common sense to document. There is a term in law called balance of probabilities, which basically means that guilt is assigned when there is a preponderance of evidence that would lead a rational person to conclude that the person did it. Theres speculation and theres lies period. But I suppose you havent a clue about that. all other evidence was purely circumstantial. And while youre on that list, you can be happy in the knowledge youre not in rarefied company. RR, Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube. She likely SUFFOCATED him to get revenge on the babys father who was planning on leaving her. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. What a contrived case! Lawyer: New evidence in 1994 killings of woman, infant After all, justice has been served in the eyes of the law, so why go on demonising her? Joanns first husband, New Jersey construction worker Michael Jack, who had reportedly abused her during their marriage, also had a solid alibi. More hairs there. Great catch. A man normally wouldnt care about killing a child, but a woman normally would have some kind of abhorrence to harming an innocent child. You say by definition! They would have no reason to protect Andrew and lie on her. Psycho For Love: Patricia Rorrer killed her ex-boyfriend's new wife September 2020 - Forensic Files Now No show. According to court papers from Patricia 2017 appeal, DNA on the cigarette butt found near the two bodies belonged to Appellant. (Prosecutor Michael McIntyre, however, told ForensicFilesNow.com that that the cigarette butt was never actually tested). 2. I wonder, did they ever perform a DNA test on the baby, to verify paternity?

Montana Federal Inmate Search, Venta Maltipoo Puerto Rico, Callahan, Florida Obituaries, Articles P