The Mescalero Apache Tribe is recognized under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and has a reservation in south-central New Mexico. Because the Tribe seeks information that is both disclosable and discoverable, we hold for the Tribe. ] These lands comprise the 23.8 acres remaining of the "small holdings claims," see n. 1, supra; 10 acres granted to St. Joseph's Catholic Church by the Act of Mar. A "return" is "any tax or information return, declaration of estimated tax, or claim for refund," and "return information" includes "a taxpayer's identity, the nature, source, or amount of his income, payments, receipts, deductions, exemptions, credits, assets, liabilities, net worth, tax liability, tax withheld, deficiencies, overassessments, or tax payments." Exclusion Will Not Result in Extinction of the SpeciesMescalero Apache Tribe; . . See Fisher v. District Court, Silver, Special Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth L. Eikenberry, Attorney General of Washington, and James R. Johnson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Arizona et al. MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE v. JONES, 411 U.S. 145 (1973) NAME: ______________________________________________________________, Message Phone: _________________________ Work: __________________________, City: _____________________ State: ________ Zip: ___________. Cancel at any time. George E. Fettinger argued the cause for respondent. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, supra, at 148-149. U.S. 165 Following New Mexico's petition for a writ of certiorari, this Court vacated the Tenth Circuit's judgment, If you continue to use your current browser then Fill may not function as expected. ] Brief for Petitioners 7, 12, 20; Tr. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed. 447 Ramah Navajo School Bd., supra, at 843, and n. 7; Bracker, supra, at 148-149; Central Machinery Co. v. Arizona Tax Comm'n, But how? New Mexico concedes that on the reservation the Tribe exercises exclusive jurisdiction over hunting and fishing by members of the Tribe and may also regulate the hunting and fishing by nonmembers. 2d 1260">851 F. Supp. [ 947, 951-52 (C.D. Children's Code and selected ordinances. Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), Court Decisions on Pretrial Release and Detention Reform, Court Rules for Pretrial Release and Detention, Public Safety Assessment For Pretrial Release and Detention, NMSC Commission on Mental Health and Competency, Safe Exchange & Supervised Visitation (SESV), Bernalillo County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (BCCJCC), How to contact Tribal Courts in your Jurisdiction, How to contact State Courts in your Jurisdiction, Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA)/Title IV-E, Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiatives (JDAI). HOLMES, Judge: This is a worker classification case about hundreds of workers whom their employer--an Indian tribe--called independent contractors but whom the Commissioner called employees. The MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe) form is 2 pages long and contains: Country of origin: US of the aboriginal Mescalero domain, was created by a succession of Executive Orders promulgated in the 1870's and 1880's. 433 With him on the brief were Solicitor General Lee, Assistant Attorney General Dinkins, and Jacques B. Gelin. Sec. 984, 25 U.S.C. We don't need to go that far here. A tribe's power to exclude nonmembers entirely or to condition their presence on the reservation is equally well established. The "intent and purpose of the Reorganization Act was `to rehabilitate the Indian's economic life and to give him a chance to develop the initiative destroyed by a century of oppression and paternalism.'" The District Court ruled in the Tribe's favor and granted declaratory and injunctive relief. Bracker, supra, at 148. The vast majority of the nonmember hunters and fishermen on the reservation are not residents of the State of New Mexico. 455 ] These efforts have included controlling and reducing the population of other animals, such as wild horses and cattle, which compete for the available forage on the reservation. The tribal authority to regulate hunting and fishing by nonmembers, which has been repeatedly confirmed by federal treaties and laws and which we explicitly recognized in Montana v. United States, supra, would have a rather hollow ring if tribal authority amounted to no more than this. (1976) (per curiam); Kennerly v. District Court of Montana, "See also Washington v. Yakima Indian Nation, The Tribe wants to take advantage of section 3402(d) in this*16 case. App. regulations on the Mescalero Apache Tribe's regulatory scheme. Because of their sovereign status, tribes and their reservation lands are insulated in some respects by a "historic immunity from state and local control," Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, supra, at 152, and tribes retain any aspect of their historical sovereignty not "inconsistent with the overriding interests of the National Government." It is true that section 3402(d) seems to place the burden on the taxpayer to show that the income tax is paid. Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico. U.S. 324, 333] [ U.S. 49, 62 All forms are printable and downloadable. Fields are being added to your document to make it really easy to fill, send and sign this PDF. 461 et seq. 107 Deer Tail Drive 9 These determinations take into account numerous factors, including the game capacity of the terrain, the range utilization of the game animals, and the availability of tribal personnel to monitor the hunts. Digital signatures are secured against your email so it is important to verify your email address. Hunter. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe: When Can a State Concurrently Footnote 26 439 Trespassers may be referred for prosecution under 18 U.S.C. The current reservation was established by a series of Executive Orders, with the most recent dating from 1883. You're on your way to completing your first doc! It reasoned that, while section 6103(h)(1), (2), and (3) speaks of disclosure to officials, section 6103(h)(4) speaks specifically*18 of disclosure in a judicial or administrative tax proceeding with no indication that disclosure should be limited to officials. Upload your own documents or access the thousands in our library. Our prior decisions also guide our assessment of the state interest asserted to justify state jurisdiction over a reservation. It tried to find its old workers and get them to fill out the form the IRS wants employers in this situation to use, but the Tribe argues that the information is just sitting there in the IRS's records. Is there a difference here between disclosure of a return and disclosure of return information? 1162(b); see also 25 U.S.C. MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Although a State will certainly be without jurisdiction if its authority to help develop and utilize Indian resources, both physical and human, to a point where the Indians will fully exercise responsibility for the utilization and management of their own resources and where they will enjoy a standard of living from their own productive efforts comparable to that enjoyed by non-Indians in neighboring communities." Moreover, unlike Confederated Tribes, supra, and Moe v. Salish & Kootenai Tribes, U.S. 52, 67 Footnote 6 During the 2009-11 tax years the Tribe either employed or contracted with several 1 Indian Nation Archives, Get Indian Law news delivered to your inbox, Directories of Tribes and Alaska Native Villages. ", [ 15. Fill - MESCALERO TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe) The answer is that the employer is off the hook--section 3402(d) provides:If the employer, in violation of the provisions of this chapter, fails to deduct and withhold the tax under this chapter, and thereafter the tax against which such tax may be credited is paid, the tax so required to be deducted and withheld shall not be collected from the employer * * *. ] For example, the Indian Financing Act of 1974, 25 U.S.C. the Tribal Council adopts hunting and fishing ordinances each year. (Emphasis added.) We agree that whether the Tribe's workers paid their tax liabilities in full tends to show whether they considered themselves independent contractors or employees and thus directly relates to their relationship with the Tribe. Set a password to access your documents anytime, You seem to be using an unsupported browser. All forms are printable and downloadable. the sovereignty retained by the Tribe under the Treaty of 1852 includes its right to regulate the use of its resources by members as well as nonmembers. U.S. 375, 381 The Mescalero Apache Tribe (Tribe) resides on a reservation located within Otero County in south central New Mexico. Those ordinances are based on the recommendations made by a federal range conservationist employed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Id. Use our library of forms to quickly fill and sign your Mescalero Apache Tribe forms online. Send to someone else to fill in and sign. Rule 71(c) requires a moving party to "annex the interrogatories to the motion, with proof of service on the other party, together with the answers and objections, if any.". Eighteen defendants, including five members of the Mescalero Apache Tribe, face federal charges in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, according to the DEA. What is unusual is the extensive disagreement among courts about the extent and even existence of these exceptions. Not the right email? Pub. threaten the Tribe's political or economic security." 24 [ 358 67 Stat. Name Mescalero Apache - Tribal Court. 411 U.S. 544, 557 . 400 App. 4. 742, 757 (1970), aff'd, 445 F.2d 985">445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. Use our library of forms to quickly fill and sign your Mescalero Apache Tribe forms online. Sex offenders who: 1) are convicted in Mescalero Apache Tribal Court; 2) reside on the Mescalero Apache Indian Reservation; 3) are incarcerated on the Reservation; 3) are students on the Reservation or 4) are employed on the Reservation must register with the Tribe. Footnote 16 8.7.16.5(3) (Oct. 1, 2015). 1998). U.S. 382, 388 2006-211. is afforded the protection of the federal criminal law by 18 U.S.C. 456 (W.D. Because the Mescalero Apache Tribe is located in New Mexico, we will assume that appellate venue in this case would ordinarily be the Tenth Circuit and will follow its law. The Commissioner doesn't invoke it in his opposition, but Rule 70(c) limits discovery where it is unreasonably cumulative or unduly burdensome or if the information is more easily obtained from another source. . U.S. 324, 339] section 5123. by the State would effectively nullify the Tribe's unquestioned authority to regulate the use of its resources by members and nonmembers, interfere with the comprehensive tribal regulatory scheme, and threaten Congress' firm commitment to the encouragement of tribal self-sufficiency and economic development. -143. . The Mescalero Apache Tribe is recognized under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and has a reservation in south-central New Mexico. The Mescalero Apache Tribe challenged two taxes imposed on the ski resort by New Mexico: a tax on the ski resort's gross receipts, and a use tax "based on the purchase price of materials used to construct two ski lifts at the resort." . [462 425 The Tenth Circuit, however, specifically rejected that argument in First W. Gov't Sec., Inc. v. United States, 796 F.2d 356">796 F.2d 356, 360 (10th Cir. P.O. (1959). We also shouldn't overlook the big issue here: If the Tribe's workers did indeed pay their tax liabilities, then the Tribe's section 3402(d) defense would be proved and would be entirely resolved. U.S., at 481 414 Mescalero Tribal Court 159 Deer Trail Mescalero, NM 88340 Phone: (575) 464-0414 Color Code Hot Line: (575) 464-9375 Fax: (575) 464-4863 General email: tribalcourt@mescaleroapachetribe.com Current updates from Tribal Court due to COVID-19 pandemic: Public Notice (11-09-20) Temp Hours (07-28-20) Public Notice (06-23-20) Announcement (05-27-20) 71-738 Argued: December 12, 1972 Decided: March 27, 1973. Federal law commits to the Secretary and the Tribal Council the responsibility to manage the reservation's resources. [ Footnote 22 Argued December 12, 1972. Rutter v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. [462 -668 (1974); Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, section 476 has been transferred to 25 U.S.C. No. The district court there found that the workers' tax records would contain evidence of how the workers viewed their status--a significant factor in a worker-classification case--and allowed disclosure under section 6103(h)(4)(C). 29 Contact Us - Cal Indian Legal Services [ Once completed you can sign your fillable form or send for signing. The Mescalero Apache Tribe was established by Executive Order of President Ulysses S. Grant on May 27, 1873. U.S. 324, 329] U.S. 145, 148 It's up to the party opposing the production to show that the information is not discoverable. [ 25 U.S.C. . 31.3402(a)-1(b), Employment Tax Regs. at 461-62. Digital signatures are secured against your email so it is important to verify your email address. . Our Court has apparently never analyzed this issue. Failure to register and update information is a crime. Footnote 9 The Indian Census schedules are census rolls usually submitted each year by agents or superintendents in charge of Indian reservations, as required by an act of 4 July 1884 (23 Stat. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. ] These conflicts have persisted despite the parties' stipulation that the New Mexico State Game Commission has attempted to "accommodate the preferences of the Mescalero Apache Tribe and other Indian tribes." Contact Persons and Location of Tribal Court: Name of Tribal Court Mescalero Apache Tribal Court Contact Person Name & Title Bessie Baca, Court Clerk Address PO Box 227 Mescalero, NM 88340 Mescalero Tribal Court - Official Website of the Mescalero Apache Tribe [ the Court. Puyallup Tribe v. Washington Game Dept., Footnote 11 App. section 3402(d) the workers' independent payment of their income tax would absolve P of its liability. 25 U.S.C. ("governmental interest in raising revenues is . [462 [462 [ NEW MEXICO, et al., Petitioner v. MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE. Footnote 30 We hold that this application of New Mexico's hunting and fishing laws is pre-empted by the operation of federal law. The Court rejected the Tribe's argument with respect to the gross receipts tax, holding that 465 . 5 719">46 Fed. File type: PDF. 450 (1965); Fisher v. District Court, supra; Kennerly v. District Court of Montana, (1973), quoting H. R. Rep. No. And section 6103(h)(4) begins: "A return or return information may be disclosed in a*19 Federal or State judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to tax administration". When, as was probably inevitable, informal discovery didn't cause the Commissioner to give up the information, the Tribe again moved to compel discovery of the Commissioner's records, but it was not in compliance with Rule 71(c) because it failed to attach the required documentation.4 The Tribe's current motion to compel discovery--this time in compliance with our Rules--asks that we decide an issue that it turns out we have not yet analyzed in any opinion: Can an employer take discovery of its workers' IRS records to reduce its own tax liability*15 under section 3402? What an employer may use to substantiate its claim under section 3402(d) in the absence of Forms 4669 is not entirely clear, and the Tribe in this motion asks specifically that the Commissioner produce the information that would appear on a Form 4669 for each worker identified in the notice of determination. The application of New Mexico's laws to on-reservation hunting and fishing by nonmembers of the Tribe is pre-empted by the operation of federal law. The Tribe clearly can exclude or expel those who violate tribal ordinances. Concurrent jurisdiction would empower New Mexico wholly to supplant tribal regulations. And, finally, does the information related to the transactional*21 relationship directly affect the resolution of the issue in this case? See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 2, n. 3. For instance, the ordinance permitting a hunter to kill a buck and a doe was designed to curb excessive growth of the deer population on the reservation. US Supreme Court Opinions and Cases | FindLaw U.S., at 150 450 108 Central Avenue / PO Box 227. , 175-177. [462 ] The Secretary assumed precisely the opposite is true - that state jurisdiction is pre-empted - when he approved a tribal ordinance which provided that nonmembers hunting and fishing on the reservation need not obtain state licenses. New Mexico has not contributed significantly to the development of the elk herd or the other game on the reservation, which includes antelope, bear, and deer. Name and address of the Chief Judge of the Tribal Court: Name Harrison Toclanny Title Chief Judge Address PO Box 227 . Id., at 16a. 455 The membership of the Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation shall consist of all persons enrolled on the 1935 census of the tribe, all children of resident members, and all children of nonresident members who have resided on the reservation for 5 years. 1. 330-344. New Mexico has hunting and fishing regulations that conflict with, and in some instances are more restrictive than, the tribal regulations, and the State has applied its regulations to hunting and fishing by nonmembers on the reservation. Mescalero, NM 88340 Mescalero or Mescalero Apache (Mescalero-Chiricahua: Naa'dahd) is an Apache tribe of Southern Athabaskan-speaking Native Americans.The tribe is federally recognized as the Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Apache Reservation, located in south-central New Mexico.. . White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 1986). United States Tribal Courts Directory. As noted supra, at 330, and as conceded by New Mexico, He was active in the American Indian . (1980). Cf. 448 See Menominee Tribe v. United States, With him on the brief were Kathleen A. Miller and Kim Jerome Gottschalk. Id., at 157. (1976), such authority may be asserted only if not pre-empted by the operation of federal law. 447 The question in this case is whether the State may so restrict the Tribe's exercise of its authority. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> 105 et seq., which contains a provision exempting Indians from a grant to the States of general authority to tax residents of federal areas, likewise provided evidence of Congress' intent to exempt Indians from state taxes. (1974). By A. Schwartz and M.J.B. 777 (fishing), which are allocated through a formula which considers the number of licenses sold and the number of acres in the State. 937, 948 (1983) (citing Branerton Corp. v. Commissioner, 64 T.C. Children's Code and selected ordinances. Table of Contents. 22. (1979); Fisher v. District Court, 447 Let us turn to that section. . . In addition, the Tribe obtained a $6 million loan from the Bank of New Mexico, 90% of which was guaranteed by the Secretary of the Interior under the Indian Financing Act of 1974, 25 U.S.C. That assumption is also embodied in an agreement between the Tribe and the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, see n. 8, supra, which openly acknowledges that tribal regulations need not agree with state laws. 2. Footnote 12 of Oral Arg. Carleton Naiche-Palmer - Wikipedia [462 This case is thus far removed from those situations, such as on-reservation sales outlets which market to nonmembers goods not manufactured by the tribe or its members, in which the tribal contribution to an enterprise is de minimis. But that may still not be enough. In Montana v. United States, we specifically recognized that tribes in general retain this authority. system. The agreement provides that "[i]nsofar as possible said regulations shall be in agreement with State regulations." -483 (State may require tribal shops to collect state cigarette tax from nonmember purchasers). Docket No. [ (1976 ed. 13 He is a father of 3 daughters and a grandfather of 1 grandson. ] Sections 3375(a) and (b) authorize the Secretary to enter into agreements with Indian tribes to enforce the provisions of the law by, inter alia, making arrests and serving process. ] The New Mexico Department of Game and Fish issued a permit for the importation of the elk from Wyoming into New Mexico. Indeed, the reservation's fishing resources are wholly attributable to these recent efforts. MESCALERO TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe), On average this form takes 5 minutes to complete. MOTION ALLEGING VIOLATION OF PROTECTION OR RESTRAINING ORDER (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Dissolution of Marriage (Mescalero Apache Tribe), APPLICATION TO MODIFY, TERMINATE, OR EXTEND THE ORDER (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Name Change Check List MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Affidavit Estate Check List MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe), MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT MESCALERO APACHE RESERVATION, NEW (Mescalero Apache Tribe), PETITION FOR RETURN OF CASH BOND (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Adoption Check List Affidavit MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Child Support Check List Affidavit / Petition for (Mescalero Apache Tribe), APPEAL FORM MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT MESCALERO APACHE (Mescalero Apache Tribe), MESCALERO TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Notice of Legal Representation (Mescalero Apache Tribe), PAYROLL DEDUCTION AUTHORIZATION FORM MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe), PAYMENT PLAN REQUEST FORM (Mescalero Apache Tribe), MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT Request for Records (Mescalero Apache Tribe), Dear Interested Applicant, Thank you for your interest (Mescalero Apache Tribe), MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATOR'S LICENSE AND DRIVING RECORD (See (Mescalero Apache Tribe). The District Court ruled in favor of the Tribe, and granted declaratory and injunctive relief . 25 U.S.C. Bracker, supra, at 151. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. , and on the State's interest in conserving a scarce, common resource. Update it below and resend. The tribal enterprise in this case clearly involves "value generated on the reservation by activities involving the Trib[e]." 23. Cl. 1165. U.S., at 565 [462 and Supp. "The unique historical origins of tribal sovereignty" and the federal commitment to tribal self-sufficiency and self-determination make it "treacherous to import . U.S. 324, 337] Use Fill to complete blank online MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE pdf forms for free. ] We reject the State's claim that the Tribe's ability to manage its wildlife resources suffers from a lack of enforcement powers and that therefore concurrent jurisdiction is necessary to fill the void. Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. Log in, Virtual Information Session for BIE Off-Reservation Residential Schools, Tribal Council declare a new Tribal holiday to honor the Apache people, WIOA Program currently taking applications. 448 See Washington v. Confederated Tribes of Colville Indian Reservation, Id., at 153a-154a. Unlike this case, Montana concerned lands located within the reservation but not owned by the 588, 18 U.S.C. The following opinions cover similar topics: CourtListener is a project of Free U.S. 164, 171 [ We've read our Rule to mean what it says. our Backup, Combined Opinion from The court found disclosure proper in judicial and administrative tax proceedings in general. See alsosec. In just the next subsection, Congress expressly allowed for disclosure of both "returns" and "return information." section 3402(a). ] Prior to 1977 the Tribe consented to the application to the reservation of the State's hunting and fishing regulations. Box 227, Mescalero, NM 88340. The email address cannot be subscribed. ; United States v. Mazurie, section 6103(h). PDF Constitution and Bylaws of The Apache Tribe of The Mescalero Reservation 1321(b), 1322(b), to undertake and regulate economic activity within the reservation, Merrion, Nevertheless, in demarcating the respective spheres of state and tribal authority over Indian reservations, we have continued to stress that Indian tribes are unique aggregations possessing "`attributes of sovereignty over both their members and their territory,'" White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, a goal embodied in numerous federal statutes. at 461, the court found that financial statements between a debtor and a creditor directly related to whether the creditor made a material misstatement to a probation officer. The Mescalero Apache Tribe is recognized under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and has a reservation in south-central New Mexico. 6103(b)(1) and (2)(A) (emphasis added). the Tribe has dramatically increased the elk population, which by 1977 numbered approximately 1,200. 1321(b). PO Box 227 This information directly related to the sentencing court's ability to resolve an issue crucial in arriving at a just sentence for the creditor. We (1941). 1451 et seq. 7. Bracker, Finally, as already noted supra, at 342, the State has pointed to no services it has performed in connection with hunting and fishing by nonmembers which justify imposing a tax in the form of a hunting and fishing license, Ramah Navajo School Bd., supra, at 843; Central Machinery Co. v. Arizona Tax Comm'n, Tribe and the Federal Government. The State concedes that the Tribe's management has "not had an adverse impact on fish and wildlife outside the Reservation." Indian tribal law." Through its management and range development (1980); Williams v. Lee, supra; Warren Trading Post v. Arizona Tax Comm'n, U.S. 544 Id. Use Fill to complete blank online MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE pdf forms for free. The disruptive effect that would result from the assertion of concurrent jurisdiction by New Mexico would plainly "`stan[d] as an obstacle to the accomplishment of the full purposes and objectives of Congress,'" Ramah Navajo School Bd., Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. 448 (1977). For instance, we have held that Indian tribes have been implicitly divested of their sovereignty in certain respects by virtue of their dependent status, With extensive federal assistance, respondent Indian Tribe has established a comprehensive scheme for managing the fish and wildlife resources on its reservation in New Mexico. Because the Mescalero Apache Tribal Court is detaining Steward, however, the Court will construe his Interlocutory Appeal/Habeas Corpus as being brought under 25 U.S.C. 98). Bernardo v. Commissioner, 104 T.C. and Supp. As described U.S., at 157 The MESCALERO TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe) form is 1 page long and contains: Country of origin: US Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2425 (2002). U.S., at 174 U.S. 324, 328] 7. See also Ramah Navajo School Bd., supra, at 845, quoting Hines v. Davidowitz, Footnote 4 Moreover, the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife stocks the reservation's waters based on its own determinations concerning the availability of fish, biological requirements, and the fishing pressure created by on-reservation fishing. Internal Revenue Manual pt. [462 458 Moreover, this aspect of tribal sovereignty has been expressly confirmed by numerous federal statutes. In McClanahan we concluded that the Buck Act, 4 U.S.C. (1977). (1982), and we now affirm. 669 (hunting), and the Dingell-Johnson Act, 16 U.S.C. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324, 334-35 & n. 17, 103 S. Ct. 2378, 2386-87 & n. 17, 76 L. Ed. Fillable MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL COURT (Mescalero Apache Tribe) However, any financial interest the State might have in this case is simply insufficient to justify the assertion of concurrent jurisdiction. ----- The Court has the discretion to dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint sua sponte under 1915(e)(2) "at any time if the action . U.S. 324, 338] We have stressed that Congress' objective of furthering tribal self-government encompasses far more than encouraging tribal management of disputes between members, but includes Congress' overriding goal of encouraging "tribal self-sufficiency and economic development." ] New Mexico concedes that the Tribe originally relied on wildlife for subsistence, that tribal members freely took fish and game in ancestral territory, and that the Treaty of July 1, 1852, 10 Stat.